Our Services
Who Owns the Data Chain Now
This report explores how professionals became unpaid content creators, how hyperscalers and AI firms extract value, and where society might push back.
Download your copy here
The Invisible Trade
The invisible trade by millions of professionals, each publishing their expertise for free, to expand their credibility as subject matter experts in their field. Visibility is the reward; the commercial value, however, is captured upstream by platforms, hyperscalers, and AI companies.
The Value Chain of Free Labour
This cycle turns intellectual output into disposable fuel for Big Tech, which was pioneered through the erosion of privacy by social media.
Professionals
Publishing expertise for free
Platforms
Capturing content and data
Hyperscalers
Processing and storing
AI Companies
Monetising the output
European Cases
When platforms normalised 'sharing everything,' society learned to give up personal data for convenience. That shift has spread into government and commerce, eroding privacy as a default expectation, eating away at core tenets of capitalism.
Italy (2022)
Clearview AI fined €20m: Italy's DPA ordered deletion of biometric/photo data scraped without consent.
Austria (2023)
Clearview ruling: The DSB ruled Clearview unlawfully collected billions of facial images.
Germany (2024)
BGH decision: The BGH held that loss of control over scraped data is sufficient for damages under GDPR.
Hungary (2024)
Like Company v. Google Ireland: Publisher alleges AI reproduced protected news without consent.
Austria (2024)
NOYB complaint vs X: Privacy group NOYB claimed X used Europeans' data for AI training without consent.
Worldwide Cases
USA (2025)
Anthropic reached a $1.5B settlement with authors whose books were used to train Claude AI.
USA (2024)
Artists sued Google over its Imagen generator for copyright infringement.
China (2025)
Disney, Universal, Warner Bros sued Chinese startup MiniMax over alleged use of characters in generative AI.
Australia (2024)
HRW found images of children in LAION-5B dataset; OAIC issued guidance on privacy in AI training.
The Cracks Have Started to Appear
The cracks have started to appear; from HiQ v LinkedIn to NYT v OpenAI and Reddit v Anthropic, lawsuits show the growing pushback over scraping, summarisation, and AI training. Disputes map neatly across the value chain.

The human cost is no longer subtle: professionals and citizens remain unpaid contributors. Their IP and PII enrich others, while courts now recognise that even loss of control itself is harm.
The Societal Mirror and Emerging Responses
The societal mirror and emerging responses are gathering support: IP unions, data sovereignty platforms, fair-trade AI, and privacy reset campaigns. These responses could reshape the value chain if they scale.
IP Unions
Collective bargaining for creators
Data Sovereignty
Platforms giving control back
Fair-Trade AI
Ethical training datasets
Privacy Reset
Campaigns for change
If nothing changes, however, professional labour remains devalued, PII becomes raw material, power concentrates, governments demand more data, and society grows conditioned to accept this reality. The outcome is not dystopian, but a continuation of today's trajectory.
There is a way through.
Data Privacy Orchestration
The story so far has been one of extraction: professionals and citizens giving away IP and PII, platforms and hyperscalers consuming it, AI companies monetising it. Regulation lags; lawsuits patch holes, where individuals remain exposed and devalued.
This construct can be rebalanced; not by halting data flows, but by orchestrating them. Data privacy orchestration is emerging as the missing layer in the value chain:
Makes consent actionable
Central hubs to grant, revoke, or fine-tune permissions
Automates data rights
Allowing individuals to request access, deletion, or portability at scale
Enforces data minimisation
Ensuring enterprises only collect what's necessary
Creates negotiation mechanisms
Enabling data unions, consent marketplaces, and fair-trade datasets
Aligns with regulation
Offering compliance middleware and auditable consent trails
Signs Are Already Here
Signs are already here: Austria's NOYB complaints, Australia's OAIC guidance, data unions like Driver's Seat, and early consent models like Apple's App Tracking Transparency.
If nothing changes, data will continue to flow unchecked, cementing society as unpaid digital labour. If orchestration takes hold, the flow could be reshaped: not blocked, but redirected with checkpoints where individuals, collectives, and regulators can assert rights and demand returns.
The question is not whether data will keep flowing. It's whether orchestration can turn extraction into a system of mutual accountability and shared value.
Suddenly, Data Privacy has turned from being a political 'third rail' into a societal safeguarding imperative.